India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Narendra Damodar Das Modi’s coronation as Prime Minister of India in 2014 was a new Chapter introduced in India’s Modern History. The Chapter would elaborate how India would pave a way for a Hindu Rashtra under the stewardship of Modi.
India became a Republic on 26th January, 1950. It was a democratic and secular Republic as enshrined in the Constitution of India and was adopted by the people of India.
The year 2024 would witness the beginning of an era of Narendra Modi which would transform India into a territory of Hindu Rashtra.
The Constitution of India would come to an end after 2024, if Modi becomes Prime Minister by the help of EVMs. Dictator Modi would declare a birth of the first Hindu state in the world.
Modi would declare himself as a life-time President of India and Hindu Rashtra would be a Presidential form of Government on the lines of Republic of China.
The repercussions of the transformation would be worse than the emergency era of 1975. The citizens of India lose freedom, liberty, justice and fraternity for the next fifty years. Muslims might be given freedom to leave the country if they do not accept the hegemony of Hindu Rashtra and its ideology.
Had George Orwell was alive he would have relished writing 2024 instead of 1984. He would have realised the fate of democracy, the press (now media), the power and the suppression of justice in 1949 itself.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Indian Minorities demoralised
Rashtra – Indian Minorities demoralised
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Muslims, mob lynching, love-jihad propaganda, property-jihad slogans, communal riots, demoralising campaigns, shaming minority kids, closing down Madrasas, veil hatred, shooting sensations and smear canvassing had been a few examples of Modiocracy experiencing in India.
In 2019, with the passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act by Parliament, a legal framework for discrimination against Muslims was established.
This Act explicitly excluded Muslim refugees from a more streamlined citizenship process. Many observers believe that this Act, combined with the planned creation of a national register of citizens, could potentially be employed in tandem to disenfranchise Muslim voters who might lack the necessary documentation to prove their citizenship.
Assault of a School Student
In Uttar Pradesh, a school teacher named Tripta Tyagi at Neha Public School in Muzaffarnagar’s Khubbapur village instructed Class II students to slap a Muslim boy. A video of the incident went viral, and the teacher made inflammatory communal comments. A case was registered against the school and the teacher under non-cognizable sections 323 and 504.
Bilkis Bano gang rape and murder of her family members
Bilkis Bano was 21 years old and five months pregnant when she was raped while fleeing the horror of the communal pogrom that broke out after the Godhra train-burning incident. Her three-year-old daughter was among the seven family members killed in the riots. All were sentenced to life imprisonment.
All 11 convicts of the pogrom were granted remission by the Gujarat government and released on August 15, 2022, during the celebration stated to be an Azaadi ka Amrut Mahotsav.
The convicts were welcomed by garlands and distribution of sweets by the BJP cadre. What type of Azaadi ka Amrut Mahotsav was that?
BIlkis Bano approached the Supreme Court of India against the remission. The remission since been annulled. All the convicts were ordered to surrender within two weeks.
The convicts went underground fearing arrest or were hidden until Maharashtra government would get them a remission.
Their plea for hearing on the remission was rejected by the Supreme Court of India on 19th January, 2024.
Suicide by an UPSRTC Bus Conductor
Mohit Yadav, a conductor at the Bareilly depot of UPSRTC, allegedly took his own life due to mental and financial stress.
Mohit had been suspended for reportedly allowing two Muslim passengers to stop a Delhi-bound bus for prayers.
The Kathua rape of a minor.
The Kathua rape case involved the abduction, gang rape, and murder of an 8-year-old girl by six men and a juvenile, in January 2018 in the Rasana village near Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir.
A protest in support of the accused men was attended by two Ministers from the Bhartiya Janata Party, both of whom later forced to resign.
Modi’s Response on Gujarat Riots 2002
Following the 2002 Gujarat violence, Modi infamously referred to relief camps for displaced Muslims as child-producing centres. In the same speech, he made a derisive remark, hum paanch, humare pachees (we five, us twenty-five), insinuating that a Muslim family consisted of a man, four wives, and twenty-five children, sarcastically alluding to a perceived rapid growth in the Muslim population.
Outbursts of Hemant Biswa Sarma, Chief Minister of Assam
Hemant Biswa Sarma, Chief Minister of Assam, blamed the rising vegetable prices on Miya cultivators and traders, encouraging Assamese youth to engage in farming and other economic activities to outcompete them.
He also claimed that the BJP did not need votes from the Bengali-origin Muslim community in Assam, accusing them of challenging Assamese culture, language, and Indian composite culture. Sarma criticized the Miya community, alleging their communal and fundamentalist tendencies, and declared that he would not want their votes.
In another instance, Sarma, while addressing a public gathering in Karnataka, made controversial remarks about Babri Masjid and Ram Janmabhoomi.
During a rally in Belagavi, Karnataka, Sarma delivered a speech that targeted the Muslim community’s culture and traditions and claimed to have had shut down 600 madrassas in Assam. He argued that this had been necessitated to prioritize regular schools and colleges in the country.
Shaheen Bagh Protests and Threats of BJP leaders
The Shaheen Bagh protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), various BJP members made controversial statements:
Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma, an MP from West Delhi Lok Sabha constituency, made a disturbing remark about entering Muslim households to harm their female family members.
Yogi Adityanath hinted at using forceful means if protesters would not cooperate through dialogue.
Amit Shah urged BJP supporters to vote so enthusiastically that those at the protest site would feel the brunt.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modiocracy onslaught on Indian womanhood
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Look at Narendra Modi’s slogan – Beti padao aur beti bachao (educate and emancipate the girl child) was thrown to winds by actions and no actions of Modi.
His Ujwala yojana, constructions of toilets, Triple Talaq bill, Nari Vandana bill, Narishakti slogan, etc. became an eye wash.
Look at the innumerable instances and atrocities committed by BJP leaders:
Three BJP IT cell employees indulge in gang rape
On 1 November 2023, a 22-year-old Bachelor of Technology student of Indian Institute of Technology, Banares Hindu University was allegedly waylaid, stripped and gang-raped by Kunal Pandey, Anand alias Abhishek Chauhan and Saksham Patel. They were BJP IT Cell employees.
The rapists also filmed the girl at gunpoint. All were arrested after three months. After the crime, all were canvassing for BJP in Madya Pradesh and Rajasthan elections.
Atrocities of Brijbhushan Sharan Singh, BJP, MP
Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, was a BJP Member of Parliament from Kaiserganj, Uttar Pradesh. He had also actively participated in the demolition of the Babri Masjid case.
He faced about 38 cases against him under various charges including theft, criminal intimidation, murder, attempt to murder, rioting, and kidnapping. Once, he stated to have said that he had committed murder of Ravinder Singh, his close colleague.
He was accused of sexual harassment when seven female wrestlers including Sakshi Malik and Vinesh Phogat and a minor testified against him in an FIR. The incidents saw many twists and turns. The female wrestlers were heckled, intimidated and dragged indiscriminately.
He is a freeman now. The wrestlers relinquished their stakes by returning their awards and medals.
Kidnapping and raping by Kuldeep Singh Sengar, a prominent BJP leader
Kuldeep Singh Sengar was accused of a rape by a sixteen-year-old girl in Unnao, when she had approached him for a job on in 2017. He was taken into custody by Central Bureau of Investigation.
Allahabad High Court took a Suo-moto cognizance of the case and ordered his immediate arrest by the CBI. In December 2019, he was convicted of kidnapping and raping.
Sexual harassment by – Sandeep Singh Saini, a sportsman and a BJP Minister
In December 2022, a junior athletics coach filed a complaint alleging that Sandeep Singh had sexually harassed her.
A case was registered against Singh for sexual harassment and criminal intimidation.
He resigned from the post of Sports Minister following the registration of case against him.
Sexual favours for jobs by Ramesh Jerikoli, a BJP Minister
Ramesh Jarkiholi, once Water Resources Minister Karnataka BJP government. He was forced to resign after being accused of demanding sexual favours from an unidentified woman in exchange for a job.
Stalking, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation by Chinmayanand, a former BJP MP and Minister
Swami Chinmayanand was charged with misusing authority for sex – as well as stalking, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation.
The woman had met Chinmayanand and enrolled at a law college run by him. She alleged that he showed her a video of her bathing and blackmailed her to have sex with him.
Rape of a minor Ramdular Gaur, a BJP MLA
Ramdular Gaur, was found guilty by an additional sessions court of raping a minor girl some years ago.
The judge sentenced him to 25 years imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹10 lakh.
Favouring Gurmeet Ram Rahim, a saviour of BJP for winning elections in Haryana.
Gurmeet Ram Rahim had been head of the Dera Sacha Sauda since 1990. On 25 August 2017, Ram Rahim was convicted of rape by a special Central Bureau of Investigation Court.
The Court sentenced him to a total of 20 years in prison, 10 years for each of the two rape convictions to be served consecutively.
He was also convicted of the murder of journalist Ram Chander. He has been granted parole innumerable times, only to please his disciples to vote for BJP
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Laws are enforced to mend opponents
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra. The frequent strengthening of laws was a relatively recent phenomenon and had a chilling effect on dissent. The government branded criticism of its policies as “anti-national,” using this label to attack opposition.
An army of volunteers was employed to identify online dissenters. Firstly, academics were targeted, with university administrators and faculty facing investigations, discipline, or forced resignations due to their perceived political views.
Administrative harassment
Critics of the government within civil society often find themselves subjected to administrative harassment. In 2020, the Modi government tightened its grip on civil society independence by amending the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA).
These amendments targeted the logistics of foreign-fund transfers, imposed limits on the nature of spending and the sharing of funds between non-governmental organizations (NGOs), granted central and state governments discretionary powers to suspend NGOs, and prohibited public servants from affiliating with such organizations.
Government authorities consistently utilized financial audits and tax-related raids, operating within the bounds of legality, against a broad spectrum of civil society groups.
Journalists threatened
Indian journalists often find themselves in precarious situations, facing threats to their lives and enduring relentless online harassment orchestrated by troll army linked to the government.
This grim reality created a cascading effect on major media networks, stifling their ability to criticize the Modi government openly.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself refrained from engaging with the media in any substantive manner, having not held a single press conference in the last nine years.
The lack of direct engagement with journalists further restricted transparency and accountability in the government’s actions and policies.
Media independence eroded
The erosion of media independence in India extended beyond biased coverage and non-engagement with critical voices. Practices such as selective licensing and the acquisition of independent media networks by individuals affiliated with the Modi government further compromised the diversity of voices in the media landscape.
Independent outlets that dare to challenge the government’s narrative often faced harassment and intimidation. The Delhi Police on Tuesday, 3 October, 2023 conducted raids on 30 locations, including the residence of journalists, in connection with a probe into the funding of news portal NewsClick.
The raids reportedly took place in the residences of NewsClick Editor Prabir Purkayastha, journalist Abhisar Sharma, political commentator and senior journalist Aunindyo Chakravarty, veteran journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Bhasha Singh, and Urmilesh.
Business tycoons control India’s media
Mukesh Ambani, a prominent businessman directly wields control over media. Gautam Adani, acquired India’s independent television network, NDTV, in December 2022.
The government consistently targeted international news organizations that offer critical perspectives, often portraying such foreign news reports as part of a conspiracy to hinder India’s global ascent.
In a concerning incident, the Indian offices of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) were raided in February 2023, immediately after the news organization released a documentary on Modi government.
Thoughtless announcements and policy decisions
India witnessed the enactment of some of its most significant laws and political decisions without meaningful parliamentary consultation and amid opposition protests.
These decisions included the sudden imposition of a national lockdown with just four hours’ notice, the controversial demonetization move, and the introduction of farm laws and transportation law.
The Supreme Courts favourable verdicts
The Supreme Court’s decisions on various pivotal political matters, such as the Ayodhya temple dispute, the Aadhar biometric ID system, habeas corpus in Kashmir, electoral bonds, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, consistently favoured the Modi government.
It was a departure from the past in Indian democracy. India’s democratic erosion took a different form. They maintained the facade of a functioning democracy while stifling opposition.
It was argued that what we were witnessing could be seen as an “undeclared” state of emergency, with little practical distinction from the era of the official Emergency.
The Modi government introduced a series of legal amendments aimed at weakening whistleblower protection, raising concerns about transparency and accountability. The Women’s Reservation Act 2023 was a mirage in futility.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – theoretical manoeuvres
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra, manoeuvres started with the coronation of Modi in 2014. One could internalise from innumerable instances cited hereunder:
The Rafale Deal
The Rafale deal related to the purchase of fighter aircraft by India from Dassault Aviation Company, France. It was alleged that there were many irregularities in the deal involving Anil Ambani. The controversy remained unanswered.
The Pegasus
In 2019, it was accused that the Indian government was involved in spying by using the services of a spy agency Pegasus. The phone numbers of human rights activists, scholars, ministers, opposition leaders, ex-election commissioners and journalists were allegedly found on a database of NSO hacked by the Pegasus.
The abrogation Article 370 in Jammu & Kashmir.
On 5 August 2019, the Government of India issued a Presidential Order superseding the 1954 order, and making all the provisions of the Indian constitution applicable to Jammu and Kashmir based on the resolution passed in both houses of the Parliament.
The Triple Talaq
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 passed on 30 July 2019. It made triple talaq illegal in India. The Act did not go well with the overall Muslim community
The Farm Acts of 2020
The Indian agriculture acts of 2020, often known as the Three Farm Bills, were approved by the Parliament without any discussion. Country wide agitations held against the Acts.
On 12 January 2021, the Supreme Court stayed the implementation of the farm laws and appointed a committee to look into farmer grievances related to the farm laws.
However, on 19 November 2021, Narendra Modi, announced that the bills would be repealed and have since been repealed.
Agitations spreading for twelve months held against the farm laws and hundreds of farmers died. It created adverse propaganda on Modi
Transporters Strike – U-turn
Drivers of trucks, buses, and tankers launched a three-day strike to protest a new law.
The law prescribed punishment of up to 10 years’ imprisonment or a maximum of seven lakh rupees fine for those who run away without informing authorities after causing serious road accidents.
The strike was called off after two days following assurance from the government that new laws on hit-and-run accidents would not be implemented until further talks with union representatives
The Hindenburg Report
The Opposition called for a debate and the Congress demanded a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigation into the meteoric rise of Adani based on the report published by the Hindenburg.
However, the government did not agree to a JPC and maintained that it had no direct involvement with Adani’s firms. Nevertheless, the Report wreaked havoc on the stock market and tarnished the image of Modi.
The Manipur Misfire
On 3 May 2023, violence erupted in Manipur between the Meitei people and the Kuki community. Hundreds were killed wounded and thousands were displaced.
On July 19 2023, a video went viral showing two Kuki women being stripped, paraded naked on the streets, slapped and sexually assaulted by Meitei men.
The video emerged after more than two months since the incident took place. Modi did not respond on the violence until the Supreme Court intervened.
He had been canvassing for the election in Karnataka and visiting foreign counties though Amit Shah paid a visit and stayed for three days.
But the situation did not improve. Rahul Gandhi visited Manipur. The Opposition Parties created a ruckus in the Parliament.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The Pulwama massacre
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra. On 14th February, 2019 a bizarre attack took place in Pulwama region of Jammu & Kashmir. A suicide ridden vehicle filled with high explosive material pierced through a CRPF bus. About 40 CRPF personnel were killed.
Narendra Modi transformed the martyrdom of CRPF to tag to his election poster by show causing his military venture in Balakot surgical strikes. Satpal Malik, the then Governor of Jammu endorsed it.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Gujarat Global Summit 2024 in Gandhinagar-Vote appeasement
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra. Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the 10th edition of Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit 2024 on the theme ‘Gateway to the Future’.
The Summit was used as a platform by the Ministry of Development of North-Eastern Region to showcase investment opportunities in the North-Eastern regions.
President of the United Arab Emirates and the Ruler of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan was one of the prominent dignitaries.
Modi wanted to exhibit the closeness with Arab world by inviting him to the Summit, whereas the Indian Muslims had been isolated, a bitter irony.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Smriti Irani leads a delegation to Saudi Arabia
Narendra Modi government sent a delegation headed by Smriti Irani, Minister for Minorities Affairs, Government of India to Saudi Arabia to meet the Saudi officials on the Hajj arrangements.
Irani signed a bilateral Haj Agreement with the Saudi Minister of Hajj and Umrah Tawfiq bin Fawzan al-Rabiah
The agreement stated that India had been granted a quota of 1,75,025 pilgrims for 2024 Hajj pilgrimage. She was criticised for not following the dress code. It was yet another gimmick of minority appeasement.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The suspension of 146 Opposition Members of Parliament.
The ruckus created by two intruders on 13th December, 2023 in Lok Sabha, was the undercurrent of desperation of the general public against misrule and overrule of Modi.
Modi’s despotic ways led to the suspension of 146 Opposition Members of the Parliament, again a historic blunder committed by him.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Disqualification of Rahul Gandhi’s from Lok Sabha membership
Rahul Gandhi got disqualified as member of the Lok Sabha on 24 March 2023.
The dis -qualification followed a conviction by the Gujarat High Court, which had sentenced him with two-year imprisonment, on the accusation of defaming Modi’s surname.
Speaker of the Lok Sabha disqualified him from the membership of the House within twenty-four hours.
On 4th August, 2023, however, the conviction was stayed by the Supreme Court. He was reinstated and was back in the Lok Sabha.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The birth of INDIA alliance
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – the birth of INDIA alliance dawned when Fifteen Opposition parties met at the residence of Nitish Kumar, Patna, Bihar on 13 June 2023.
It was convened to galvanise their intent to get united for a common cause of taking necessary measures to unseat Narendra Modi and to defeat Bhartiya Janata Party in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.
Four meetings held and seating arrangement formula was being finalised to fight 2024 Parliamentary elections unitedly.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modi’s eliminations
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The surge in elimination tactics witnessed during Modi’s era had been unprecedented in Indian political history. It was akin to a form of character assassination, with a penchant appetite for nipping potential challenges in the bud.
Modi established the Marg Darshak Mandal—an asylum for former stalwarts of the BJP—shortly after becoming Prime Minister. Most of the senior colleagues of BJP were the victims of his eliminations.
To get dividends on electoral gains Modi announced the highest civilian award Bharat Ratna to Karpoori Thakur of Bihar and Lal Kishan Advani.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The pillars of Indian democracy crumbled
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – the bulwarks of Indian democracy are -the Judiciary, the Legislature, the Executive, the bureaucracy, the Press & Media and the Institutions
All of these are in commotion. The executive has over-powered all of them and all of a sudden.
The Judiciary pressurised to act in tandem with the Executive to adjudicate in its favour.
But, the Judiciary, of late, stick to its independence in some cases. But the Executive was adamant and continue to have its own ways to dictate the judiciary.
The media monitored to focus on the Executive, its leader, government policies and programmes. No space was rendered to the voices of the opposition fearing the government onslaught.
Institutions captured to witch-hunt the opposition leaders and parties to join the ruling dispensation or to support its leader.
Leadership cult, character building and worship became order of the day.
Modi built a new parliament building representing a cow-head shape, prophesied to be a good omen to his future prospects of becoming Prime Minister again and again.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Narendra Modi aspires Global Leadership
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modi aspired for a global leadership when India was being marginalised from various fronts.
Dwindling democratic institutions, disenfranchisement of political leaders, diminishing civil liberties, detaining of opposing political leaders, dismantling political parties, disproportionate disbursement of money for gigantic pomp and show of election show-blitz campaigns, mobilisation of masses for election meetings, establishment of a theological state etc. would negate Modi’s aspirations.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modi grabs most of the donations and economy is direction less.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modi’s Bhartiya Janata Party grabs ninety percent of donations. PM Cares’ Fund found to be obscure and non-transparent. Bank debtors fled India and loans amounting to 14,000 crores of waved.
Gautam Adani had been omnipresent and omnipotent. Two Industrialists control media houses and the media eulogies Modi and his government policies and programmes. Banks bulldozed.
They seldom help general public but big businesses. Banks became centres of digital money transactions engines and got less work to do in the bank premises.
The Paytm bank financial mismanagement led to derecognition of its financial services due to Modi’s policies. People lost millions due to nosedive of shares.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Media falls flat under Modi
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra- In India, the media technically got the freedom to voice dissent, but reality was quite different. Independent journalists often face harassment, and media ownership tends to be concentrated in a way that limited diverse perspectives.
It led to a culture of self-censorship among journalists and individuals. The checks on executive power eroded rapidly. Members of civil society who criticized policymakers were at risk of surveillance, harassment, intimidation, imprisonment, injury and so on.
New York Times in its 3 February 2024 edition said that India Media made the moment of the 22nd January, 2024 Ram Lalla Consecration as much about Narendra Modi, as it was about Lord Ram.
It said that about a dozen national television channels tried to outdo each other as it was their guiding mission – to shine a favourable spotlight on the prime minister’s every move.
The Indian broadcast media loaded with incentives and goaded in coercion, indulged in an image-building machine that glorified Modi as an infallible, or a godlike leader.
The media did not discuss on Chinese encroachment on Indian border territory, deadly ethnic conflict in a northeastern region, unequal economic growth that is not producing enough jobs etc.
The consecration hurried to coincide with the launch of the prime minister’s campaign for a third term in office. His address was full of his powerful oratory, his keen eye for symbolism and his savvy understanding of messaging in a new media age, the paper said.
The cronies of BJP attacked the paper as biased.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – The ruling BJP government tried to create so many hurdles to thwart the Yatra. But did not succeed. But the Yatra proceeded from a different location in Manipur from 14, January, 2024.
Assam Chief Minister Hemanta Biswas Sarma threatened Rahul Gandhi not to enter Guwahati lest he should be arrested. One FIR was registered. On 22nd January, 2024 Rahul was not allowed to enter Shri Shri Shankar Dev Satra temple, Bordua, Assam.
He encountered the Police as to know the reason for denial of entry of the temple. He wanted to go alone in the police vehicle which was denied. Gaurav Gagoi, MP and Rakbul Hassan, MLA were allowed to the visit the temple to seek blessing on behalf of Rahul
Rahul’s convoy sat on a dharna reciting Gandhi bhajan – raghupati Raghava rajaram.
On 23rd January, 2024 the Nyay Yatra was not allowed. A tussle between the Yatris and the Police when barricades were pushed aside the restive Yatris.
Many Yatris were beaten with lathis. His meeting with a university student was denied but students came out to meet him.
Rahul aborted the move to forcibly enter Guwahati and diverted the route to ensure the movement of the Yatra. He appreciated the police for the duty that had been assigned to them.
Another FIR was filed which could lead to arrest of Rahul. During the Yatra Bihar government of flipped and repetition of the same was thwarted in Jharkhand.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Indian Muslim Film Artists suffer majoritarianism tendencies
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra- The assumption that Indian Muslim Film Artists vow and bow to the majoritarianism was false.
Nevertheless, personal preferences, is no democracy and does not go well with precepts of the Constitution of India is untrue.
The Constitution provides personal freedom and freedom of speech to every citizen of this country India, that is Bharat.
Film Industry had been instrumental in shaping the secular fabric and nationalism, of the general masses of the country.
The Film Industry and the artists had been role-models for the public, notwithstanding the religious practices they follow or believe.
Dilip Kumar, Saira Banu, Nargis, Waheeda Rahman, Khayyam, Mohamad Rafi, Khayyam, Zakir Hussain, Imtiaz Ali, Salim Khan, Javed Akhtar. Kaifi Azmi etc. were dear to all Indians not to speak Naseeruddin Shah, Aamir Khan, Shahrukh Khan.
If some of them tilt or show a slight allegiance to a political party they were attacked by Bhartiya Janata Party zealots. Should they express their opinions they were branded anti nationals.
The so-called party functionaries, directed by their fundamentalists’ core cadre wage a war of verbosity. These elements forget that these artist community is as Indian nationals as they are.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Ram Mandir Consecration – resentment of four Shankaracharyas
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra Ram Mandir consecration ceremony was held on January 22, 2024 in Ayodhya. Several politicians, movie stars and sports personalities affiliated to BJP attended the grand celebrations.
The four Shankaracharyas were not part of the ceremony. The four Maths located in the North, South, East and West of India did not grace the consecration.
The Shankaracharya of Gowardhanpeeth, Swami Nishchalanand Saraswati Jagannath Puri, Odisha;
Shankaracharya Bharati Teerth Shankaracharya of Sringeri Sharda Peeth, Karnataka;
Shankaracharya Sadanand Saraswati, the Shankaracharya of Paschimannaya Dwarka Shardapeeth in Gujarat; and
Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand looks after the activities in Jyotir Math, Uttarakhand.
All of them objected to the non-practise of Vedic ways, customs and procedures of the consecration of the God’s incarnation.
Ganeshwar Sastri Dravid, an Astrologer and a Vedic Schoolar fixed the good omen for the consecration on 22nd January, 2024 and Stone laying ceremony on 5th August, 2024. He disagreed with the views of the Shankaracharyas.
He ancestors belonged to Tamil Nadu. South appeasement could have been the reason for Narendra Modi to defy the four Matts.
Modi created a schism between the Shankaracharyas with that of Mahants of North India. He redefined the contemporary Hinduism with that of Modi Hinduism.
Modi tried to differentiate a neo-Hinduism which should eulogize Modi Hinduism based no his vote oriented Modiocracy.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Narendra Modi in the incarnation of a political hermetism.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Narendra Modi observed an eleven-day fasting and sleeping on floor with strict food habits.
Narendra Modi’s journey began on January 12, 2024 in Maharashtra’s Nashik Kalaram Temple visit.
On January 16, 2024, visited Lepakshi Veerabhadra Temple, Andhra Pradesh.
On January 17, 2024, visited the Lord Krishna temple in Guruvayur, and Thriprayar Shree Ramaswami Temple.
On January 20, 2024, visited Ranganathaswamy Temple in Tamil Nadu’s Tiruchirappalli, which had its historical ties to Ayodhya.
According to Vaishnava literature, this idol had a connection to Ayodhya as it was believed that Lord Ram had handed over the picture of Vishnu to Vibhishana, directing him to carry it to Lanka.
Narendra Modi ended his spiritual tour of the States by visiting the famous Sri Kothandaramaswami Temple and Arichalmunai point in Dhanushkoti, Tamil Nadu on January, 21, 2024.
It was said that all the tedious observance of the rituals and practice done to appease the Hindu community of South India for electoral gains.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Modi becomes refugee of EVMs
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra in the elections held in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh EVM scam alleged and about 15,000 complaints were filed with Election Commission of India from Madhya Pradesh alone.
Supreme Court of India was approached for hearing the scam complaints and the High Courts of Madhya Pradesh was directed to look into the complaints and deliver judgements within two months.
It was alleged that the EVMs were showing ninety percentage battery charge intact even after hours of use. Postal ballots did give edge to Congress but EVMs results shown reprehensible results.
Why EVMs were brought from Gujarat State? What had happened to the nineteen lakhs stolen EVMS? About 6.5 lakhs VVPAT machine were stated to be non-functional or faulty. All these questions have no answers.
In the past all the petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India were dismissed on the grounds that the petitioners of were not from the aggrieved parties.
The Election Commission of India filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court that the EVMs were hundred per cent manipulation free. But the Election Commission refused to give EVMs to the experts to prove them that the EVMs could be manipulated.
All these apprehensions ought to be answered by the Election Commission of India. A scam in disguise seems to have played by corporate lobby and Indian agents.
The INDIA alliance at their fourth meeting held on 19th December, 2023 passed a resolution that the VVPATS be counted.
Experts and NGOs suggested that there was no need to replace the EVMs but slips could be lengthened, print visibility be ensured for a longer time.
The slips be handed over to the voters and dropped in the ballot boxes for counting them. It required no approval of the Parliament and the Election Commission could do it.
Counting machines could also be placed alongside the ballot boxes. The voter would press the button before dropping the ballot in the ballot box. This feature might be taken as a first voting trends before actual counting of VVPATS slips.
On 5th December, 2023 Narender Mishra of Madhya Pradesh filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India stating that the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh and Prime Minister had violated the election code and the Election Commission of India did not take any action,
The Supreme Court of India directed the Madhya Pradesh High Court to take up the issue along with the complaints of Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh,
Narender Mishra filed another application before the Election Commission of India and the Supreme Court that the voter data published by the Commission was faulty.
On 30 January, 2024 EAS, Sarma, former Secretary to the Government of India, wrote to the Election Commission of India that there was a conflict of interest in the appointment independent directors affiliated to the Bhartiya Janata Party on the Board of the Bharat Electronics Limited.
The Independent Directors were Mansukhbhai Shamjibhai Khachariya, Dr Shivnath Yadav, Shyama Singh, and PV Parthasarathi. He wrote the letter eleven months backs also. The Commission did not respond to his letters.
Sarma further said that the Companies Act mandates that an independent Director should play a pivotal role in managing the affairs of the company.
On 24 January, 2024, Digvijaya Singh carried out a demo of how EVMs could be manipulated. Atul Patel, a technical expert, demonstrated the manipulation in the presence of the media.
The Congress MP Jairam Ramesh wrote to the Election Commission to ensure the safety of the EVMs. The Commission assured him that EVMs would comply with the legal framework and jurisprudence.
19 August 2023, a group of former civil servants wrote to the Election Commission of India, urging it to maintain the sanctity of the electoral process and safeguarding democracy.
Supreme Court advocates Mahmood Pracha and Bhanu Pratap requested the Commission to hand over 50 ‘sealed’ electronic voting machines to them so that the lawyers might take them to each state capital to prove their vulnerabilities. Later they demonstrated how the EVMs could be manipulated.
On 5th January, 2024, they led a march pressing their demands. They were detained and arrested by Delhi police
On 15th December, Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav advocated against the machines.
Subramanian Swamy, perennial critique of Narendra Modi emphatically said that the EVMs would not be manipulated. But he failed to grasp the politics of Narendra Modi.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Swamy vs. Modi
Subramanian Swamy, had been the bete-noire of economic policies of Narendra Modi. Swamy was lured by Modi by offering him many gubernatorial posts including BRICKS Bank Presidentship.
Modi tried to fail him by flocking to the South sojourns. Swamy declared that he would contest against Narendra Modi in Varanasi.
The installation of Sengol in Parliament, his pilgrimage to south Indian temples and deities, his reach to the southern electorate, his spectacular presentation of the consecration Ram Lalla were the examples how Narendra Modi tried to undermine Swamy’s image.
Modi wanted to outsmart Swamy, who remained an intellectual and economist of AC rooms. Swamy never fought the political battle on the street. He always fought in the courts or on the closets.
Whereas Modi did the opposite and succeeded. Swamy braded Modi’s opponents including the press and media as cowards. Swamy neither agitated against Modi nor did he challenge him on the streets and amongst the public.
He had been an arm-chair scholar and politician who did not dare to face anybody on the ground, more so Modi.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – Democracy strangulated in Chandigarh.
Bhartiya Janata Party strangulated the process of the election to the post of Chandigarh Mayor.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on January 24, 2024 ordered to hold the Chandigarh Mayoral Elections on January 30, 2024.
In a dare devil act and on cameras showing the blatant misuse of machinery, the election was ransacked.
Anil Masih, Presiding Officer for the election invalidated eight votes of the opposition without following the proper procedure. He was an office-bearer of the BJP’s minority wing.
He declared Manoj Sonkar as winner with 16 votes opposition candidate Kuldeep Kumar got 12 and 8 votes declared invalid.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal accused the BJP of cheating. He decided to challenge the election in the court.
This act of dacoity could be an example what would happen in the Parliamentary elections in 2024.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – democracy mocked in Jharkhand.
BJP hunted Hemant Soren, the then Chief Minister of Jharkhand for long. Enforcement Directorate served ten notices on him. When he finally went to the Directorate on 31st January, 2024, he was informed that it had decided to arrest him on land scam.
He called a meeting of the Legislators supporting him, where Champai Soren was elected as Chief Ministerial candidate on 1st February, 2024. Hemant Soren met the Governor and submitted his resignation.
He also submitted a resolution of the legislature party in which Champai Soren was elected as Chief Ministerial candidate. The Governor refused to entertain his submission.
Forty three legislators presented themselves to prove the majority. The Governor said that he would consider their request in a day or two.
Rattled by the decision of the Governor and the back-door planning of the BJP, the JMM decided to shift their camp of MLAs to Hyderabad to save them from poaching.
The flight of the MLAs was not allowed to fly on the pretext that the sky was not clear due to fog. However, they landed in Hyderabad the next day
A great commotion was in making in the press and media for about two days, and in view of the Parliament Session, and the arrival of Bharat Jodi Nyay Yatra led by Rahul Gandhi in Jharkhand.
The Governor agreed to call the CM elect, for swearing in ceremony on 2nd February, 2024 where Champai Soren was made Chief Minister of Jharkhand.
He was asked to prove his majority in ten days. The Assembly was convened on 5th and 6th February, 2024.
A petition was also filed in the Supreme Court of India by Abhishek Manu Singhvi on 1st February,2024, which came to hearing on 2nd February, 2024.
The Bench of the Court led by Justices Sanjiv Khanna, M M Sundresh and Bela M Trivedi directed the portioner to approach the high court.
In the meanwhile, Hemant Soren was sent to five-day Enforcement Directorate custody by a PMLA court.
Thus, a great drama was enacted by the BJP to take over the government of the opposition led by Hemant Soren.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – CAA & NRC
The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019
The Citizenship Amendment Act passed by Parliament on 11 December 2019 and received Presidential assent on 12 December 2019.
The Act relaxes eligibility criteria for Indian citizenship for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India on or before 31 December 2014.
The Act does not apply to tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura as included in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
It also does not apply to the areas under the Inner Line Permit regime under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873.
Muslims protested the Act. They argued that the Act excluded Muslim persecuted Ahmadiyyas and Rohingyas. They contended that the Act violated the principles of equality and secularism under the Constitution.
The government justified the Act as a humanitarian gesture towards religious minorities in Islamic theocratic states of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. It stated that Muslims were not persecuted in these Islamic countries and the Act would not affect Indian Muslims.
However, experts argued that the Act was the result of the majoritarian politics of BJP rather than humanitarian concerns.
The Act amended Sections 2, 3 and 6 of the Citizenship Act, 1955. Section 2 relaxes eligibility criteria for citizenship by naturalization for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India on or before 31 December 2014.
The required period of residence in India for these communities, reduced from 11 years to 5 years. The registration or certificate of naturalization would not be required. They were exempted from provisions of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 and Foreigners Act, 1946
National Registrar of Citizenship (NRC)
The National Register of Citizens created fears of disenfranchisement of Muslims. It was said CAA and NRC violated Article 14 and 21 rights of Muslims since they create religious criteria for Indian citizenship.
In Assam the NRC excluded around 20 lakh applicants, many of whom were Muslims and long-term residents.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra Majoritarianism and Human Rights – the cases of USA and Europe
In the United States and Europe, white supremacy enjoyed political support. In mid-1950s, however, the racist doctrines disfavoured in the West.
In early 2016 Donald J. Trump, got support from white masses. Trump had also questioned the validity of Obama’s American birth certificate and, during the campaign, issued racist attacks on immigrants and ethnic minorities.
He vowed to build a wall along the U.S., Mexico border to deport some 11 million persons living in the country illegally, and to ban immigration by Muslims.
During Trump regime hate crimes increased on Muslims, Hispanics, and Jews. The racists became active and outspoken.
However, the USA protected the minorities by American civil rights movement, civil rights legislation through the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965). The Supreme Court invalidated many racially discriminatory laws.
When world dismembered the discriminatory laws, India brought back the majoritarian doctrines for electoral gains.
The CAA was against the spirit of the Constitution of India. It established the religious supremacy in India. Hindus would not be affected by the CAA if they do not have proper documents at the same time Muslims would be affected.
India wins Hinduism – 2024 decides India or Hindu Rashtra – the Conclusion
It is said that the theories of Sanskritization and Brahmanisation are being enacted by the BJP in India where Muslims are being packed in the category of Dalits. The Indian Dalits would be turned to be main stream Hindus.
But the so-called Dalits would never be covered under ST/SC Act. The theory would not be spontaneous but would be a politically motivated.
Thus the BJP negated the sociological theories of Sanskritization and Brahmanisation propounded by the great Sociologist, M.N.Srinivas in 1960.